Part 107 Waivers: What's Actually on the List
A waiver doesn't mean asking the FAA nicely. It means proving an equivalent level of safety for one specific, listed section, and no other.
The word "waiver" gets used loosely in drone forums as a stand-in for "special permission for anything unusual," which is close enough for casual conversation and wrong enough to cost exam points.
A waiver applies to specific sections, not to Part 107 in general
14 CFR §107.200 sets the general waiver policy: the FAA may issue a certificate of waiver authorizing a deviation from specific regulations, if the applicant demonstrates the operation can be conducted safely under the terms of that waiver. The key word is specific. There's no general-purpose "waiver from Part 107" that clears every provision at once; each waiver is tied to the exact sections it covers.
§107.205
the section listing exactly which Part 107 rules are eligible for a waiver
Not everything is waivable
14 CFR §107.205 enumerates which sections a waiver can actually apply to, and the list is deliberately bounded. Operating rules like the requirement for a remote pilot certificate, aircraft registration, and the prohibition on careless or reckless operation aren't on the waivable list at all; no waiver process removes them. What typically is eligible includes things like operation from a moving vehicle, daylight-only limitations in specific narrower forms, and certain visual-line-of-sight and altitude restrictions, depending on what's currently listed.
The waivable-sections list isn't permanently fixed. It has been amended before as new operational categories (like the Category 1-4 pathway for operations over people) reduced the need for a waiver on provisions that used to require one. Treat "is this section waivable" as a question with a current, checkable answer, not something to memorize once and assume never changes.
Demonstrating safety is the actual work
Getting a waiver approved isn't a matter of asking; it's a matter of the applicant showing the FAA how the specific deviation will still meet an equivalent level of safety to the rule it's deviating from. A request that just states "we need to fly beyond visual line of sight" without addressing how visual contact or an equivalent mitigation will be maintained isn't demonstrating anything the FAA can approve.
A waiver isn't the FAA looking the other way. It's the applicant proving the safety case the base rule would otherwise assume.
Why this shows up on the exam at all
Part 107 candidates aren't expected to file a waiver application, but they are expected to know the difference between an operation that's simply not permitted under the base rule, one that could become permitted through a waiver, and one that's never eligible for a waiver at all, regardless of the safety case made. Scenario questions on this topic usually test exactly that three-way distinction rather than any specific waiver's paperwork.
The full policy language and current waivable-sections context are in the handbook.
Free diagnostic
Reading about drones is one thing. Passing the Part 107 test is another. See where you stand.
Take the free 10-minute diagnostic